Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements_中国颗粒学会

在线阅读

Volurnes 72-75 (2023)

Volurnes 60-71 (2022)

Volurnes 54-59 (2021)

Volurnes 48-53 (2020)

Volurnes 42-47 (2019)

Volurnes 36-41 (2018)

Volurnes 30-35 (2017)

Volurnes 24-29 (2016)

Volurnes 18-23 (2015)

Volurnes 12-17 (2014)

Volurne 11 (2013)

Volurne 10 (2012)

Volurne 9 (2011)

Volurne 8 (2010)

Volurne 7 (2009)

Volurne 6 (2008)

Volurne 5 (2007)

Volurne 4 (2006)

Volurne 3 (2005)

Volurne 2 (2004)

Volurne 1 (2003)

在线阅读

Partic. vol. 37 pp. 99-106 (April 2018)
doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2017.08.001

Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements

Alessia Nicosiaa,b, Laura Manodoric, Arianna Trentinid, Isabella Ricciardellid, Dimitri Baccod, Vanes Poluzzid, Lorenza Di Matteoe, Franco Belosia,*

Show more

f.belosi@isac.cnr.it

Highlights

    • A comparison between a soft X-ray (SXR) neutralizer and radioactive neutralizers was made. • Particle penetration inside SXR neutralizer was parameterized with equivalent pipe length method. • SXR neutralizer could be used with particle sizer spectrometers to replace radioactive one.

Abstract

Most conventional aerosol neutralizers are based on radioactive sources, which are controlled by strict regulations restricting their handling, transport, and storage. The TSI 3087 soft X-ray (SXR) neutralizer circumvents these legal restrictions. The aim of the present work is to compare the performance of a standalone SXR aerosol neutralizer with that of conventional radioactive aerosol neutralizers based on 85Kr (TSI 3077) and 241Am (Grimm 5522) by performing field tests in a real environmental scenario. The results obtained when the SXR neutralizer was connected to a mobility particle sizer spectrometer (MPS), different from the device suggested by the manufacturer, were comparable with those obtained with the use of radioactive aerosol neutralizers. In changing the neutralizer, the particle number concentrations, measured with the MPS connected to the SXR neutralizer, almost remained within the 10% uncertainty bounds for the particle size interval 10–300 nm, when diffusion losses inside the SXR tube were considered. Based on our comparisons, the SXR neutralizer can be regarded as a standalone instrument that could solve the problems associated with legal restrictions on radioactive neutralizers and fulfil the need for a portable instrument for different field test purposes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Aerosol neutralizer; Soft X-ray non-radioactive charger; Mobility particle sizer spectrometer; Particle size distribution; Diffusion losses